Agreements To Modify Contracts For The Sale Of Goods

According to standard contractual theory, a "no oral modification" clause has little effect, as the parties can amend the clause orally. It would be unlikely that the commercial parties would actually agree orally, as a first step, to amend the `no oral amendment` clause, followed by an oral amendment to the substantive provisions of the Treaty. Such a formalism may be hypothetically accepted in a law classroom, but that is not the way commercial parties act. However, if the substantive provisions of a treaty are amended orally, it would be legitimate to conclude that there is also an oral amendment to the "no oral amendment" clause. Article 2 shall apply to contracts for the sale of goods. [2] Goods are things that can be identified and moved at the time of the conclusion of the contract. When a small contractor is in this position, they can avoid legal action by not violating the contract. Instead of breaking the contract, a business owner can try to change the contract by changing its terms. There are several reasons why a company wants to include in a sales contract or otherwise a provision that any modification or termination of the contract must be made in writing. The objective may be to indicate who is entitled to accept a change. This would be particularly the case where the clause provides that the amendment must be signed by a particular person or position.

Amending a contract often has cost or price implications that the company may wish to consider before accepting the change. . . .

About the Author

katkearns